Enteroatmospheric fistula is a challenging and emerging clinical situation, mainly related to “open abdomen” technique in damage control surgery for trauma and in case of multiple laparotomies. We report the case of a 61-year-old male patient, affected by rectal carcinoma, submitted to standard surgical treatment and gradually evolving in persistent proximal jejunal fistula. The positioning of a cardiac septal occluder (Amplatzer®) was associated with immediate and late favourable effects. The procedure was conducted “bed-side” and turned out to be easy and safe. Show less

Aim: To analyze the factors involved in and the results of stoma reversal after an emergency Hartmann's operation. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study from the Valencian Society of Surgery of patients who had undergone an emergent Hartmann’s operation from 2004 to 2008. An analysis of the reversal rate and related factors, delay, and morbidity of reconstruction was performed. Results: Three hundred sixty-two patients were studied. The most frequent initial diagnosis was colorectal cancer, followed by complicated acute diverticulitis; the primary surgical indication was acute peritonitis. After a median follow-up of 52 months, 151 patients (41.7%) underwent surgery to reverse the stoma at a median of 10 months after initial surgery. Diagnosis of diverticulitis or trauma, peritonitis as the surgical indication, and non-advanced tumors were associated with reversal. Multivariate analysis showed that only age and tumor stage were predictive of reversal. Postoperative complications occurred in 44% of the cases, and wound infection was the most common. There were 9 (6%) anastomotic leaks. Thirteen patients (8.6%) retained a permanent or temporary stoma after the attempted reconstruction. Conclusion: Hartmann’s reversal after emergency surgery is performed in less than half of all such patients and has significant morbidity. Show less

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by Fecal Immunohistochemical Testing (FIT) followed by colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality. Barriers to colonoscopy should be minimised. Objective: To compare psychological “risks” of colonoscopy in FIT positive (FIT+) subjects and those with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Method: IBD patients undergoing colonoscopic CRC surveillance were age and gender matched with FIT+ individuals awaiting colonoscopy. Subjects completed Spielberger State and Trait Scales for current levels of anxiety, depression, anger and curiosity, versus long term personality tendencies. Results: 70 IBD respondents were matched with 70 FIT+ respondents, (57% male, mean age 57.6 years). FIT+ subjects demonstrated greater scores for state Anxiety (22.3 vs 20.3 p=0.024), Curiosity (24.3 vs 21.8 p=0.036), Anger (13.7 vs11.5 p=0.037) and Depression (23.8 vs21.2 p=0.002). Conclusion: FIT+ patients experience more anxiety and depression prior to their colonoscopy than IBD patients, which may reduce colonoscopy uptake and is important to address. Show less

Background Despite the existence of the statutory early cancer detection program in Germany and the removal of financial barriers, which is frequently reported in the literature to be the main obstacle in screening, uptake of colorectal cancer screening remains quite low. The campaign for colorectal cancer screening in German companies reported in this article started in 2010. It was initiated because of the low compliance with opportunistic public colorectal cancer screening efforts. Its goal is to improve participation by offering an organized screening program using a simple test (FIT). Methods An offer for company employees is publicized through posters, company newsletters and the intranet. The difference between the positivity rates of those who returned the kits within 20 days and later than 20 days was assessed using the Z-test. The average time between a positive result and colonoscopy was estimated using the Poincaré plot method. The positive predictive values were calculated for carcinomas, advanced adenomas or any lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of immoCare-C published by Vogel et al. and Hundt et al. were used to derive the confidence intervals for the positive likelihood ratio (for carcinoma and any kind of adenoma). Results A total of 312,147 kits were returned and analyzed (return rate 70.2%). 5.6% gave a positive result. The PPV for cancer aged between 55 and 74 was 4.6% for men and women (95% CI: 2.38%-6.76% and 1.28%-7.99%, respectively), but 22% for men (95% CI: 17.93%-26.65%) and 8% for women (95%CI: 3.63%-12.26%) for advanced adenomas. The PPV for any lesion was higher for those with familial risk (49.3%) and 42.6% for those without familial risk (95% CI: 40.2%-45.0%), but with overlapping confidence intervals. Conclusions The reported sample is not representative. Although, offering CRC screening in companies may be an effective way of increasing uptake in the target population. Differences in the test performance between men and women need further evaluation. Show less