Editorial Policies

Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request.

All submissions undergo initial editorial screening. Manuscripts that meet the journal's scope and minimum requirements proceed to independent peer review.

Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts.

In single-blind review, reviewers know the authors' identities and authors are not told the reviewers' identities. Authors who request double-blind review prepare an anonymized manuscript as described in the Instructions for Authors; when double-blind review is requested, editors ensure that author-identifying information is not shared with reviewers.

Editorial decisions are based on scope, scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and relevance to the journal. The handling editor makes the decision, informed by the reviewers' reports, under the oversight of the Editor-in-Chief. Decisions are to accept, to request minor or major revision, or to reject. Reviewers' comments are shared with the authors, and reviewers' identities remain confidential.

Guidance is given in the Reviewer Guidelines and Editors Guidelines.

Editorial decisions rest with the journal's editors and are independent of the article processing charge, of any fee-relief inquiry and of commercial considerations. Manuscripts submitted by the Editor-in-Chief, members of the editorial board or their close collaborators are handled by an editor without a conflict of interest, and the submitting editor takes no part in their review or decision.

JSCE follows the guidance of COPE and the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Concerns about plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, image manipulation, duplicate or redundant publication, citation manipulation and undisclosed conflicts of interest are investigated following COPE guidance, and may lead to rejection, correction or retraction.

Research involving human participants, identifiable human data or human biological material requires approval from an appropriate research ethics committee or institutional review board, where applicable. The manuscript names the committee, gives the approval reference number, and states that informed consent was obtained, or that a waiver was documented by the ethics committee, where applicable. Research is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, where applicable.

Studies that use anonymized, publicly available or routinely collected data, including cancer registry data, state whether ethics review was required and, where an exemption applies, which body granted it. Case Reports require informed consent for publication from the patient or a legal guardian, or a waiver documented by the ethics committee, where applicable; identifying details, including clinical images, are removed unless they are essential and covered by that consent.

Interventional clinical trials must be registered in an accepted public trial registry at or before the first participant provides consent for enrollment. The registry name, registration number, and registration date must be reported in the manuscript.

Authorship follows the ICMJE criteria: each author has made a substantial contribution to the work, has drafted or critically revised it, has approved the final version and agrees to be accountable for it. Contributions are described with the CRediT taxonomy, and people who contributed without meeting the criteria, including providers of writing or editorial assistance, are acknowledged. The corresponding author is responsible for communication with the journal on behalf of all authors. Changes to the author list after submission require the written agreement of every author and are handled following COPE guidance.

Authors disclose all financial and non-financial interests that could be seen to influence the work, and describe every source of funding together with the role of the funder in the study and the decision to publish. Disclosures are published with the article. Editors and reviewers declare any conflict of interest with a manuscript and are recused from handling it.

Submitted manuscripts are screened with Crossref Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate. Editors assess each similarity report in context, including overlap with the authors' own earlier work, before deciding how to proceed. Manuscripts submitted to JSCE report original work that has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. Posting a preprint is compatible with submission; authors cite the preprint in the cover letter.

Every empirical research manuscript must include a data-availability statement. The statement explains where the data supporting the results can be found, or the conditions under which they can be accessed when ethics approval, participant consent or data-provider terms restrict sharing. Deposit in a recognized repository is encouraged, and analysis code is shared where possible. See Data Archiving and Permissions.

Research is reported following the guideline that matches its design, for example STROBE, RECORD, PRISMA or CARE, and the completed checklist is submitted with the manuscript where applicable.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large-language-model tools are not listed as authors. Authors disclose any use of AI tools in preparing the manuscript, analyzing data or producing figures, naming the tool and describing its use in the Methods or Acknowledgments, and remain responsible for the accuracy, originality and integrity of the work. Editors and reviewers keep manuscripts confidential. Reviewers must obtain journal permission before using AI to assist with a review. Any permitted use must be disclosed, and confidential manuscript content must not be uploaded where confidentiality cannot be assured.

When an error or concern about a published article is identified, the journal publishes a correction, an expression of concern or a retraction, following the COPE retraction guidelines. Each notice is linked to the original article, and a retracted article remains available with the retraction clearly marked. Authors who find an error in their published work contact the editorial office.

Authors may appeal an editorial decision by writing to the editorial office at info@openaccesspub.org with a reasoned case that responds to the editors' and reviewers' comments. Appeals are considered by an editor who was not involved in the original decision. Complaints about the conduct of the journal or its staff are sent to the same address and handled following COPE guidance.

All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain the copyright of their work. See Copyright and License.

An article processing charge applies to accepted articles; withdrawal after submission is subject to the journal's withdrawal policy. The charge and the withdrawal policy are set out on the Article Processing Charges page. Fee-relief inquiries are considered case by case and do not influence editorial decisions.

Articles published in this journal will be deposited in Portico, a not-for-profit digital-preservation archive run by ITHAKA (the organization behind JSTOR), so that the scholarly record stays available for the long term, even if a title one day ceases to publish.

Read our preservation policy